Some thoughts on Love and its variety


[Thoughts provoked by someone who talked about Unconditional Love.]

Like many words in the language the oft-used term Love has many connotations. Its use and meaning may even vary from person to person.
To me, Love is an intense emotional attachment to some entity or person. In this sense I love many entities and a few people.

The entities include mathematics, music, poetry and physics,

The people include my wife of more than fifty years, our children and their families, my siblings, as well as a few very close friends. The love I have for them is not unconditional (whatever that may mean), but unfailing. My love for them has always been there, irrespective of circumstances.
But I distinguish love from liking – a verbal distinction one can make more easily in English than in most European languages.

Love includes pain at separation, while liking only gives pleasure in company. Thus, I like all [most? :-)] people, most Democrats, many Republicans, most of the books I chose to read, and good chocolates, as also a few politicians, conservatives, humorists, and movie stars.
As to Nature, I care for it, I admire it, and I am grateful to it for enabling me to live on this planet, but I can’t say I love it. I will do what little I can for Nature’s sustenance and non-violation. I am hesitant to use the term love for trees and lakes, meadows and mountain tops, and not for toads and termites.
I respect people generally, of whatever race or religion, nationality or political persuasion all long as they don’t step on my toes or negatively provoke me by their hurtful attitudes.

n spite of the wise injunctions sages, I cannot in honesty say that I love all people on our planet: I am unable to even understand what that could mean.Though this may sound somewhat un-Christian, I will confess that though I have liked most of my neighbors I have not exactly loved them.

As to loving God, I really don’t know what that implies either, though I know that mystics and inspired religionists have claimed that they do just that. My translation of the phrase loving God would that one should treat with care and respect all of God’s healthy creations: that excludes many viruses and bacteria from my very anthropocentric perspective.

August 27, 2015

Advertisements

About Varadaraja V. Raman

Physicist, philosopher, explorer of ideas, bridge-builder, devotee of Modern Science and Enlightenment, respecter of whatever is good and noble in religious traditions as well as in secular humanism,versifier and humorist, public speaker, dreamer of inter-cultural,international,inter-religious peace.
This entry was posted in Miscellaneous. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Some thoughts on Love and its variety

  1. Philip Rowlings says:

    Dear V V I take it you are aware of M. Scott Peck, he had a good definition of love: wanting what is best for the other, even if it costs you a great deal. Your thoughts on this? Regards Phil

    Sent from my iPad

    >

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s