To explain the phenomenal world to the last detail is what the scientific enterprise is all about. For this, one needs to adopt a course. That course, since the seventeenth century, includes instruments, experiments, definitions, theories and such. But there is something more: the laws of nature, as Galileo noted, are in the language of mathematics. The role of sophisticated mathematics in the physicist’s elucidation of phenomena is far more significant than its formulation in that abstract language. There are aspects of reality of which we cannot have the slightest inkling without the aid of mathematics. Mathematics is the most fruitful road to a coherent, consistent, and rational grasp of the magnificent simplicity that underlies the horrendous complexity of reality. This truth is amplified in the book under review.
Mathematical physicist Roger Penrose – well known for his thesis that the currently recognized laws of physics are incomplete and for his call for a new theory to explain consciousness – begins his book with an essay on the conceptual framework of his reflections: The mind grasps the marvelous subtelies inherent in the mathematics that rules the phenomenal world; the phenomenal world, in turn, has allowed, if not instigated, mind to evolve. After formulating these key principles, he offers a brief note on the Good, the True, and the Beautiful, reminding this reviewer of the Hindu notion of satyamshivamsundaram (TruthGoodnessBeauty) which sees the Divine in this seamless triune.
The next fifteen chapters of the book treat the informed reader to the mathematical nuggets that serve as bricks for the edifice erected by physics in its grasp of the world. Penrose does this with erudition, insight, and flair, as also considered opinions on the state of physics. He takes us on a grand tour, à la Dante, of the abundant orchards of mathematics: from Pythagorean Greece with its irrational numbers and proofs of propositions, to transfinite numbers, Turing machines and Gödel’s theorem. He recalls for us complex numbers and logarithms, calculus, analytical continuation, Fourier series, hyperfunctions, and much more. But all this is a feast only for those who have benefited from advanced courses in mathematics. Contrary to what the flap invitingly says, this book is not for the lay reader, no matter how serious. One might as well browse though the Upanishads in sacred Sanskrit.
Next follow ten chapters dealing with practically every cog in the grand machine of twentieth century theoretical physics: relativity, quantum physics, Lagrangians, Hamiltonians, symmetry groups, quantum field theory, the standard model, and the Big Bang. Again the reader familiar with the topics will be charmed, but others will be jolted into the recognition of how little they know of ivory tower esoterica.
In the current formalism of quantum mechanics (QM), in any collection of microentities every part is inextricably linked to every other, somewhat as every member of a society is connected to all others. This inevitable holism is called quantum entanglement. Penroses’s chapter on quanglement (as he calls it) is one of the clearest technical discussions of the topic. We read here his own take on the associated issues. Quanglement is related to measurement theory which Penrose calls the measurement paradox because of the awkward puzzles that arise when one tries to be specific about the parameters associated with quantum states. This cannot be discussed without referring to the ubiquitous psi function which has been subjected to varying interpretations, resulting in the nebulous ontology of QM. Penrose feels a clarification is urgent.
The standard model is a crowning achievement of twentieth century physics in its vision of the roots of matter and phenomena. In his nonstandard discussion of this venerated paradigm, Penrose reminds the reader that this is not the “ultimate answer.” He also says that string theory “gains its support and chooses its directions of development almost entirely from aesthetic judgments guided by mathematical desiderata.” By describing the originator (Edward Witten) of string theory as a more remarkable mathematician than he realizes, Penrose subtly conveys his lack of enthusiasm for this theory and its variants which have been popularized by able exponents
Penrose contends that many currently respected theories of physics are highly speculative: a view shared by others beyond the ivory tower, but one that can be stated so bluntly and boldly only by a Penrose.
The decadesold attempts to synthesize gravity with other fundamental forces are presented at length, always with the caution that none of these is to be taken as the last word. Penrose is harsh on those who dream of a final theory when he says that “most physicists of the day (1920s) were not so foolish as to think that this (the physics of their time) could shortly lead to a ‘theory of everything’.”
Penrose talks about the role of fashion in physical theory: a postmodernist contention which may not sit well with many scientists. He says that in business concerns “it is the large ones that have a natural tendency to get larger at the expense of smaller ones,” and so it is in physics too. By implication, this is the reason why his own theory of twistors hasn’t received as much attention. He warns that “with ideas that are far from the possibility of experimental confirmation,” one “must be especially cautious in taking the popularity approach as any real indication of its validity.”
By the time I had waded through a thousand and odd pages, fascinated as I was by the conciseness and clarity with which all the magic of mathematical physics is presented, I had forgotten that I was supposed to be traveling on the road to reality. Then to my surprise I read the statement: “I do not believe that we have yet found the true ‘road to reality,’ despite the extraordinary progress that has been made … in the last few centuries.” I will admit that right from the start I did not resonate with the title of the book because there are after all different roads to different kinds of reality: the mystical, the poetic, the philosophical, to name a few. And within physics itself there is a multilemma as to which of the many roads it has to choose from. So it is not surprising that physics hasn’t found the road to reality. Mathematics is one road to it.
Penrose is not shy of using words like mystery and miracle qua scientist. In this humility he displays the wisdom that eludes some other creative minds. The crux of his message is that physics offers us many wonderful things through the mathematical channel; yet it would be a serious error to mistake creative mathematics for physical reality. Dante concluded his masterpiece with a gaze on the radiance, instigated by “the love that moves the sun and other stars,” Likewise, Penrose realizes in the end that morality and beauty are as much there as Platonic mathematics in the expanded vision of the human mind. As I interpret this, science without humanity is dry and lifeless. Aesthetics breathes charm into science, and ethics makes it human in an enlightened way.

Archives
 June 2017
 May 2017
 April 2017
 March 2017
 February 2017
 January 2017
 December 2016
 November 2016
 October 2016
 July 2016
 June 2016
 May 2016
 April 2016
 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 November 2015
 August 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2013
 February 2013
 January 2013
 December 2012
 November 2012
 October 2012
 September 2012
 August 2012
 June 2012
 March 2012
 January 2012
 December 2011
 November 2011
 October 2011
 September 2011
 August 2011
 July 2011
 May 2011
 April 2011
 March 2011
 February 2011
 January 2011
 November 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 August 2010
 June 2010
 May 2010
 April 2010
 March 2010
 February 2010
 January 2010
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 September 2008
 August 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 December 2007
 November 2007
 October 2007
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007

Meta